| |
|
Selected Pyrotechnic
Publications of K.L. and B.J. Kosanke,

Part 2. (1990 through 1992)
The cover price is US$25.00. This book contains 106 pages.
Table of Contents (Part 2)
Report
of Aerial Shell Burst Height Measurements |
|
Aerial shell burst height data is perhaps one of the more interesting
and important pieces of information that an artistically minded
display designer needs. Unfortunately, this information has generally
not been available and has essentially never been reported in the
technical fireworks literature. One of the authors recently published
an article suggesting a simple design for an instrument to collect
burst height data.1 Another author fabricated an instrument based
on that design, and now offers similar instru-ments (Pyro-Meter
II) for sale to the industry.2 This article reports on the first
use of the instrument to collect burst height data for commercial
aerial shells. |
| |
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 2. |
Introduction
to the Physics and Chemistry of Low Explosives (Parts 1-3) |
|
This article is a slight modification of an article originally
prepared for the International Association of Bomb Technicians and
Investigators. Because much of this same material is of interest
to the fireworks community, this article was offered to the PGI
Bulletin. However, in order to enhance its usefulness, some
additional material was included and other sections were rewritten. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 10. |
Shimizu
Aerial Shell Ballistic Predictions, Parts 1 & 2 |
|
The effect of varying aerial shell and mortar parameters is a
frequent topic of discussion in the display fireworks industry.
Dr. Takeo Shimizu has published equations describing both internal
(within the mortar) and external (after leaving the mortar) aerial
shell ballistics. These equations can be used to make general predictions
of the effects of aerial shell and mortar characteristics on shell
and mortar performance. Shimizu's work only addressed spherical
shells; however, his equations can be used for cylindrical shells
providing an appropriate drag coefficient is used. (For the purposes
of this article, the drag coefficient of air resistance for cylindrical
shells was assumed to be twice the value used by Shimizu for spherical
shells.) |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 12. |
Hazard
Data for Chemicals Used in Pyrotechnics |
|
In recent months, the authors have received a surprising
number of requests for sources of chemical hazard information. Perhaps
this is a consequence of the industry’s increasing concern
for health and safety. Whatever the reason for the requests for
information, the authors have prepared this article to assist those
needing to locate reliable and practical hazardous chemical information. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 4. |
Burn
Characteristics of "Visco" Fuse |
|
From time to time there is speculation regarding the performance
characteristics of visco fuse under various conditions. This article
presents the results of a brief study of this topic. The fuse for
this study was purchased from American Visco Fuse in 1989. While
it is likely that visco fuse from other manufacturers will perform
similarly, that has not been verified. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 5. |
Saran
Resin -- Its Properties and Uses |
|
Saran™ resin in its most common form is Saran Wrap,™
the original plastic food wrap manufactured by Dow Chemical. Technically,
Saran resin is polyvinylidene chloride, which has the chemical formula
of: [CH2·CHCl2—]n.
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), has the empirical formula of: [CH2·CHCl—]n.
Thus Saran resin is essentially PVC with a second chlorine atom
per formula unit. Where PVC is only 57% chlorine, Saran resin is
73% chlorine. (Note that Parlon,™ which is 68% chlorine, also
falls short of Saran resin.) |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 1. |
Pyrotechnic
Fuse Burn Rates |
|
Over the years, we have had occasion to work with a fairly large
number of different fuse products. One of the more important characteristics
of a pyrotechnic fuse is its burn rate, but often that is not specified
by the supplier. Thus, when we have had a large enough supply of
a type of fuse to make an accurate determination, we measured its
burn rate. To do this, three pieces of fuse, 36 inches in length
were prepared. Then, using a stopwatch, the time taken to burn each
piece of fuse was measured, and the average determined. For future
reference, these values were recorded, along with burn times (in
seconds per inch) and burn rates (in inches per second). We had
not given the matter much further thought, until, following a lecture
on the “Identification of Pyrotechnic Devices,” we received
a number of requests for that information. Unfortunately, the data
was scattered throughout several notebooks, and not in a form ready
for distribution. In order to fulfill our promise for the data,
we compiled the table following. With the thought that there might
be others wishing the same data, this brief article was prepared. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 2. |
A
Collection of Star Formulations |
|
At one time, we were engaged in the commercial manufacture of
stars. During that time we assembled (developed, borrowed or modified)
a series of star formulations. It was felt that the formulations
were reasonably safe and cost effective, while at the same time,
performed well (relatively easy ignition and fairly good color or
comet effects). Over the years, when asked for advice concerning
useful star formulations, we frequently supplied copies of these
formulations. In the thought that there are others that might wish
to have access to them, this short article has been assembled. |
| |
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 2. |
Production
of Benzoate Color Agents |
|
The use of copper(II) benzoate as a blue color agent was discussed
by Bleser.1 In large part, the endorsement for its use is based
on its ability to serve as both color agent (copper) and fuel (benzoate).
There is something to be said for this approach. For example, consider
a color agent such as copper(II) carbonate (CuCO3); it
is only the copper that is useful in producing color. What is more,
energy is required to free copper from its carbonate ion. Consequently,
the flame tem-perature is lowered, which in turn results in less
colored light output. It would be preferred if the copper could
be made available without having to pay the full energy cost of
freeing it from the carbonate ion. One way to do this is to chemically
combine copper with a fuel such as the benzoate ion. Then, when
the fuel is consumed, copper will be left over and ready to make
the blue color-generating molecule, copper monochloride (CuCl).
Because copper benzoate is not commonly available, Bleser described
one way to produce it. There is, however, another way to produce
copper benzoate. This process is a little more complicated, but
the same basic process can also be used to make many other interesting
pyrochemicals, only one class of which are benzoates. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 3. |
Parallel
and Propagative Burning |
|
In effect, there are two basic mechanisms for pyrotechnic burning.
One, which is primarily burning inward, perpendicular to the burning
surface, and one in which accelerated burning along surfaces is
most important. These can be termed “parallel” and “propagative”
burning, and the same pyrotechnic material can manifest radically
different burn rates depending on which type of burning predominates.
A theoretical discussion of burn rates and the many factors effecting
burn rate is beyond the scope of this article; however, a working
knowledge of these two types of burning is useful in understanding
the way in which a number of fire-works items function and, on occasion,
malfunction. Also, should the need arise to dispose of pyrotechnic
materials by burning, a knowledge of these two types of burning,
and the potentially dangerous transition that might occur between
the two, could be of critical importance. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 7. |
Dautriche
- Shock Tube Measurement of High Propagation Rates in Pyrotechnic
Materials |
|
There are times when it is of interest to measure
propagation rates in highly energetic pyrotechnic materials, such
as flash powder. These rates tend to range from less than 1000 to
about 5000 feet per second. Conventional means of making such velocity
of propagation (VOP) measurements involve the application of techniques
developed for use with high explo-sives in order to make velocity
of detonation (VOD) measurements. Some examples of the equipment
used are high speed framing cam-eras, streak cameras, continuous
velocity probes, and any of the various so-called “pin”
techniques. These approaches require expensive instruments and in
some cases may not be entirely reliable in the lower reaction pressure
regime of pyrotechnics, especially when weakly confined. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 6. |
Repeat
Firing from HDPE Mortars |
|
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) mortars are beginning to find
wide use because of their desirable characteristics. They are relatively
inexpensive, lightweight, have a long service life, and some consider
them to be among the safest mortars presently in use. Initially
HDPE mortars were only recommended for use in electrically fired
displays, where each mortar is fired only once. This was done because
of a desire to take a cautious approach with this relatively new
mortar material, even though the mortars had successfully passed
some repeat firing tests. Now, it is becoming increasingly common
to use HDPE mortars for manually discharged displays, in which individual
mortars are fired repeatedly. The mortars heat up during firing,
and, being a thermoplastic, they lose strength with increasing temperature.
If mortar temperature rises sufficiently high, they will burst during
use, venting the lift gases needed to propel shells to safe altitudes.
To date there has been no systematic study of HDPE mortars under
conditions of repeat firings, in order to determine the safe limits
for their use. Thus it is appropriate to more carefully examine
the performance of HDPE mortars under conditions of repeat firing
and to offer guidance for their use. Measurements were made of the
thermal energy deposited in a mortar during the process of firing
10.2 cm (4 in.) aerial shells and of the distribution of that thermal
energy along the length of mortars for typical aerial shell firings.
Then, measurements were made of the rate of heat dissipation from
HDPE mortars freely exposed to air and when buried in dry sand.
Finally, data was collected regarding the ability of HDPE mortars
to survive shell firings as a function of temperature. With this
information, very rough guidelines are proposed for repeat firing
of thick-walled, 10.2 cm (4 in.), SDR–17, HDPE mortars. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 12. |
Aerial
Shell Drift Effects |
|
A prime consideration in determining separation distance requirements
for aerial fireworks displays is where fallout of dangerous debris
is likely to occur. Certainly the most dangerous single piece of
fallout is a dud aerial shell. Thus it is important to have knowledge
of where duds may fall during typical displays. This would be a
relatively simple situation if aerial shells were ballistically
stable, and they precisely followed the path determined by mortar
orientation, shell muzzle velocity, and atmospheric conditions.
Unfortunately, however, aerial shells tend to drift from their ideal
(predicted) path, and that drift is greater than most realize. In
order to determine where dud shells fall, a large number of aerial
shells, both spherical and cylindrical, were fired into the air
after having been rendered incapable of bursting at altitude. Most
firings were from mortars that were positioned vertically and under
calm wind conditions; however, some firings were from angled mortars.
For spherical aerial shells, 7.6 cm to 25.4 cm (3 in. to 10 in.)
it was found that, on average, duds fall 3.8 m per cm (32 ft per
in.) of shell size, from the point ballistically predicted. Further
the data suggests that drifts as great as 12 m per cm (100 ft per
in.) of shell size may occur nearly 1 percent of the time. For cylindrical
shells, 7.6 cm to 15.2 cm (3 in. to 6 in.) it was found that, on
average, duds fall 2.4 m per cm (20 ft per in.) of shell size, from
the point ballistically predicted. Finally, a large number of 10.2-cm
(4-in.) cylindrical shells were fired in order to determine the
effect of shell weight, shell length, and lift powder weight on
drift distance. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 13. |
Computer
Modeling of Aerial Shell Ballistics |
|
If one has a reasonably accurate computer model, it is usually
appropriate (cheaper and faster) to rely primarily on modeled results,
supplemented with limited experimental results. The case of aerial
shell ballistics is no exception. The mathematical basis for such
a ballistics model is derived, and the simplifications and assumptions
of the model are considered. The necessary input parameters are
developed and some modeling results are presented. Finally, the
use of the model is demonstrated by performing a series of calculations,
including the effect of mortar tilt angle and wind speed. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 7. |
Pyrotechnic
Accelerants |
|
Conventional accelerants used in arson crimes, such as gasoline,
readily burn in air producing flame temperatures of about 3000 °F.
Yet these accelerants generally lack the ability to produce major
involvements in short times. This is because, like most combustion
reactions, they must rely on a continuing supply of air to provide
the needed oxygen. Thus, even when there is a large amount of accelerant,
it is of little value unless there is a corresponding large supply
of fresh air. |
|
Reprint
Information: Number of pages = 1. |
|