| |
|
Titles and Abstracts for Issue No. 4, Winter 1996
|
|
|
|
Dr. R. I. Grose, Dr. M. Cartwright and Professor
A. Bailey |
|
|
Abstract: Data obtained from
an analysis of an extinguished strobe star using the technique of
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is used to provide additional
evidence for a previous model for the cyclic burning process seen
in a white strobe star composition. The model relies on the generation
of hot liquid on the surface of the star to initiate the burning
process.
Keywords: hot metal liquid,
scanning electron microscopy, strobe star, strobe mode
|
|
|
|
|
K.L. and B.J. Kosanke |
|
Abstract: A series of tests
of various flash powders under weak confinement were conducted to
determine the sound pressure levels and tonal quality produced.
In these tests it was found that: the sound output from four common
sources of potassium perchlorate are essentially equivalent; there
are significant differences in the level of sound output as a result
of using six different common aluminum powders; the addition of
either of two common flow or bulking agents have essentially no
effect on the sound produced; the substitution of potassium chlorate
for potassium perchlorate in a common flash powder has essentially
no effect on the sound produced; and the addition of antimony sulfide
or sulfur reduces the duration of positive phase without increasing
the level of the sound produced. In short it was found that nothing
surpassed the level of sound produced by a 70:30 mixture of reasonably
high quality potassium perchlorate and a high quality flake aluminum
powder. This is significant because the use of potassium chlorate,
antimony sulfide, and sulfur seriously increase the sensitivity
to accidental ignition.
Keywords: salute blast pressure,
flash powder, sound, weak confinement, sound pressure
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hara, M. Kanazawa, and T. Yoshida |
|
Abstract: A hazard evaluation
has been carried out for the safety assessment of a new non-azide
gas generant for automotive airbag inflators. The gas generant (UN)
is composed of urazole (U) and a metal nitrate (MNO3:N)
with other additives included to provide the required performance.
The impact, shock, friction, electric spark, hot object and heat
sensitivities were determined by the appropriate tests. Propagations
of detonation, deflagration and combustion were examined using the
United Nations gap test and VP 30 tube test. A mixture of urazole
with KClO4 in a stoichiometric ratio propagated detonation
as measured by the gap test and self-sustaining combustion as measured
by the tube test. The mixture of urazole with KNO3 propagated
combustion, but no detonation.
Keywords: air-bag, gas generant,
hazard evaluation, safety analysis, manufacturing safety, sensitiveness
testing methods, urazole
|
|
|
|
|
F. Ryan |
|
Abstract: In a fuel-air salute
a fine metallic fuel is first dispersed into the surrounding air,
then exploded. Such a salute is much safer than a conventional salute
as the fuel-air salute must be surrounded by air to obtain the oxygen
needed to function. It will not explode violently in bulk or in
a mortar tube; even when fired while lying on the ground, its explosive
power is greatly reduced. This preliminary paper summarizes progress
achieved to date in fuel-air salute construction and suggests areas
for future study.
Keywords: salute blast pressure,
dust explosion, blast pressure, sound pressure, fuel-air salute
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. Maxwell |
|
Introduction: The fact that
certain pyrotechnic compositions when pressed into a tube and ignited
burn with a loud whistling noise has been known and used by firework
manufacturers for many years. The two compositions most widely employed
appear to be (a) a mixture of dry powdered potassium picrate and
potassium nitrate in the proportions of about 60/40 and (b) a mixture
of powdered gallic acid and potassium chlorate in the proportions
25/75. Whistling compositions have occasionally been used for military
purposes. Thus in World War II the Germans had a whistling cartridge
(pfeif-patrone) for signaling and the Canadians used a whistling
thunderflash for training purposes. In October, 1943, the author
was instructed to investigate in collaboration with the Admiralty
the use of pyrotechnic whistles burning under water as a possible
counter measure to the acoustic homing torpedo then being used by
the Germans. As little was known about the factors influencing the
intensity and frequency of the sound made by pyrotechnic whistles
or their mode of action an investigation into this subject was made
and is described in the present paper. A number of measurements
were also made on pyrotechnic whistles burning under water, but
as they are mainly of acoustical interest only, they will be dealt
with very briefly.
Keywords: sound pressure, whistle,
pyrotechnic measurements, pyrotechnic theory
|
|
| |
|

Please send comments and suggested corrections to:
B. Kosanke,
Publisher, Journal of Pyrotechnics, Inc.
1775 Blair Road Whitewater, CO 81527 USA
Phone/FAX +970-245-0692
You Can Help Keep Fireworks Legal
Did you know that efforts are underway in the United States at both State
and Federal levels to ban consumer fireworks and rocketry forever? You
can help turn the tide by joining the Fireworks Alliance.
It's free, and we need your voice today!
|
Journal [1995-2007
/ Issues 1-26] - Journal [2008
and beyond / Issues 27 +]
Reference
Series - Literature
Series - Training
Order
Area - Search - Sponsor Links - Other
Links
Copyright Journal of Pyrotechnics, Inc. ---
1998 - 2010
All rights reserved.
|